CorrelateAI › Pairs
US Meat Consumption per Person vs US Female Labor Force Participation
US Meat Consumption per Person and US Female Labor Force Participation correlate at r = +0.51 over 34 years (1990–2023), p = 0.0019. With the time trend removed, r = +0.67. Holds up after detrending.
Verdict: Holds up after detrending. Statistically significant (p = 0.0019) and the association survives trend removal (detrended r = 0.67). Correlation still isn't causation, but this one isn't an obvious artifact.
- Pearson r
- +0.51
- p-value
- 0.0019
- Years compared (n)
- 34 (1990–2023)
- 95% confidence interval
- 0.21 to 0.73
- Correlation with the time trend removed
- +0.67
Sources
- US Meat Consumption per Person (kg/year): Our World in Data. US Meat Consumption per Person (Our World in Data: Per capita consumption of meat).
- US Female Labor Force Participation (% of women 15+): World Bank. US Female Labor Force Participation (World Bank indicator SL.TLF.CACT.FE.ZS).
Related pairs
- US Annual CO₂ Emissions vs US Meat Consumption per Person (r = +0.91)
- US Meat Consumption per Person vs US Infant Mortality (r = -0.91)
- US Meat Consumption per Person vs US Nuclear Power Generation (r = +0.90)
- US Meat Consumption per Person vs US Rural Population (r = -0.89)
- US Meat Consumption per Person vs US Urban Population (r = +0.89)
- US Meat Consumption per Person vs US Life Expectancy (r = +0.87)
Correlation does not imply causation. How the verdict is worked out.