CorrelateAI › Pairs
US Female Labor Force Participation vs US Rural Population
US Female Labor Force Participation and US Rural Population correlate at r = -0.07 over 36 years (1990–2025), p = 0.686. With the time trend removed, r = -0.75. Not statistically significant.
Verdict: Not statistically significant. With n = 36, this correlation isn't statistically significant (p = 0.686). It could easily be chance.
- Pearson r
- -0.07
- p-value
- 0.686
- Years compared (n)
- 36 (1990–2025)
- 95% confidence interval
- -0.39 to 0.26
- Correlation with the time trend removed
- -0.75
Sources
- US Female Labor Force Participation (% of women 15+): World Bank. US Female Labor Force Participation (World Bank indicator SL.TLF.CACT.FE.ZS).
- US Rural Population (% of total): World Bank. US Rural Population (World Bank indicator SP.RUR.TOTL.ZS).
Related pairs
- US Rural Population vs US Urban Population (r = -1.00)
- US Population vs US Rural Population (r = -0.97)
- US Adult Obesity vs US Rural Population (r = -0.95)
- US Median Age vs US Rural Population (r = -0.95)
- US Electricity Generation vs US Rural Population (r = -0.95)
- US Life Expectancy vs US Rural Population (r = -0.95)
Correlation does not imply causation. How the verdict is worked out.