CorrelateAI › Pairs
US Mobile Subscriptions vs US Rural Population
US Mobile Subscriptions and US Rural Population correlate at r = -0.89 over 50 years (1960–2024), p < 0.0001. With the time trend removed, r = -0.16. Likely spurious (shared time trend).
Verdict: Likely spurious (shared time trend). Both series mostly just trend over time. After removing that trend the correlation collapses to -0.16 — the relationship is probably coincidental, not causal.
- Pearson r
- -0.89
- p-value
- < 0.0001
- Years compared (n)
- 50 (1960–2024)
- 95% confidence interval
- -0.94 to -0.81
- Correlation with the time trend removed
- -0.16
Sources
- US Mobile Subscriptions (per 100 people): World Bank. US Mobile Subscriptions (World Bank indicator IT.CEL.SETS.P2).
- US Rural Population (% of total): World Bank. US Rural Population (World Bank indicator SP.RUR.TOTL.ZS).
Related pairs
- US Rural Population vs US Urban Population (r = -1.00)
- US Mobile Subscriptions vs US Resident Patent Applications (r = +0.99)
- US Adult Obesity vs US Mobile Subscriptions (r = +0.98)
- US Internet Users vs US Mobile Subscriptions (r = +0.98)
- US Internet Usage vs US Mobile Subscriptions (r = +0.98)
- US Forest Area vs US Mobile Subscriptions (r = +0.98)
Correlation does not imply causation. How the verdict is worked out.