CorrelateAI › Pairs
US Meat Consumption per Person vs US Forest Area
US Meat Consumption per Person and US Forest Area correlate at r = +0.03 over 34 years (1990–2023), p = 0.874. With the time trend removed, r = -0.63. Not statistically significant.
Verdict: Not statistically significant. With n = 34, this correlation isn't statistically significant (p = 0.874). It could easily be chance.
- Pearson r
- +0.03
- p-value
- 0.874
- Years compared (n)
- 34 (1990–2023)
- 95% confidence interval
- -0.31 to 0.36
- Correlation with the time trend removed
- -0.63
Sources
- US Meat Consumption per Person (kg/year): Our World in Data. US Meat Consumption per Person (Our World in Data: Per capita consumption of meat).
- US Forest Area (% of land): World Bank. US Forest Area (World Bank indicator AG.LND.FRST.ZS).
Related pairs
- US Forest Area vs US Mobile Subscriptions (r = +0.98)
- US Forest Area vs US Resident Patent Applications (r = +0.97)
- US Adult Obesity vs US Forest Area (r = +0.97)
- US Forest Area vs US Population (r = +0.97)
- Atmospheric CO₂ (Mauna Loa) vs US Forest Area (r = +0.95)
- US Adolescent Birth Rate vs US Forest Area (r = -0.94)
Correlation does not imply causation. How the verdict is worked out.