CorrelateAI › Pairs
US Female Labor Force Participation vs US Gross Savings
US Female Labor Force Participation and US Gross Savings correlate at r = +0.10 over 35 years (1990–2024), p = 0.586. With the time trend removed, r = +0.00. Not statistically significant.
Verdict: Not statistically significant. With n = 35, this correlation isn't statistically significant (p = 0.586). It could easily be chance.
- Pearson r
- +0.10
- p-value
- 0.586
- Years compared (n)
- 35 (1990–2024)
- 95% confidence interval
- -0.25 to 0.42
- Correlation with the time trend removed
- +0.00
Sources
- US Female Labor Force Participation (% of women 15+): World Bank. US Female Labor Force Participation (World Bank indicator SL.TLF.CACT.FE.ZS).
- US Gross Savings (% of GDP): World Bank. US Gross Savings (World Bank indicator NY.GNS.ICTR.ZS).
Related pairs
- US Female Labor Force Participation vs US Health Expenditure (r = -0.87)
- US Annual CO₂ Emissions vs US Female Labor Force Participation (r = +0.85)
- US Alcohol Consumption vs US Female Labor Force Participation (r = -0.82)
- US Gross Savings vs US College Enrollment (r = -0.80)
- US Energy Use per Capita vs US Female Labor Force Participation (r = +0.76)
- US Nuclear Power Generation vs US Gross Savings (r = -0.75)
Correlation does not imply causation. How the verdict is worked out.