CorrelateAI › Pairs
US Milk Consumption per Person vs US Female Labor Force Participation
US Milk Consumption per Person and US Female Labor Force Participation correlate at r = +0.65 over 34 years (1990–2023), p < 0.0001. With the time trend removed, r = +0.59. Holds up after detrending.
Verdict: Holds up after detrending. Statistically significant (p = < 0.0001) and the association survives trend removal (detrended r = 0.59). Correlation still isn't causation, but this one isn't an obvious artifact.
- Pearson r
- +0.65
- p-value
- < 0.0001
- Years compared (n)
- 34 (1990–2023)
- 95% confidence interval
- 0.40 to 0.81
- Correlation with the time trend removed
- +0.59
Sources
- US Milk Consumption per Person (kg/year): Our World in Data. US Milk Consumption per Person (Our World in Data: Per capita consumption of milk, excluding butter).
- US Female Labor Force Participation (% of women 15+): World Bank. US Female Labor Force Participation (World Bank indicator SL.TLF.CACT.FE.ZS).
Related pairs
- US Female Labor Force Participation vs US Health Expenditure (r = -0.87)
- US Milk Consumption per Person vs US Forest Area (r = -0.86)
- US Annual CO₂ Emissions vs US Female Labor Force Participation (r = +0.85)
- US Alcohol Consumption vs US Female Labor Force Participation (r = -0.82)
- US Milk Consumption per Person vs US Wind Power Generation (r = -0.78)
- US Milk Consumption per Person vs US Health Expenditure (r = -0.77)
Correlation does not imply causation. How the verdict is worked out.