CorrelateAI › Pairs
US Annual Working Hours per Worker vs US Female Labor Force Participation
US Annual Working Hours per Worker and US Female Labor Force Participation correlate at r = +0.62 over 34 years (1990–2023), p < 0.0001. With the time trend removed, r = +0.52. Holds up after detrending.
Verdict: Holds up after detrending. Statistically significant (p = < 0.0001) and the association survives trend removal (detrended r = 0.52). Correlation still isn't causation, but this one isn't an obvious artifact.
- Pearson r
- +0.62
- p-value
- < 0.0001
- Years compared (n)
- 34 (1990–2023)
- 95% confidence interval
- 0.35 to 0.79
- Correlation with the time trend removed
- +0.52
Sources
- US Annual Working Hours per Worker (hours): Our World in Data. US Annual Working Hours per Worker (Our World in Data: Working hours per worker).
- US Female Labor Force Participation (% of women 15+): World Bank. US Female Labor Force Participation (World Bank indicator SL.TLF.CACT.FE.ZS).
Related pairs
- US Annual Working Hours per Worker vs US Health Expenditure (r = -0.89)
- US Annual Working Hours per Worker vs US Infant Mortality (r = +0.89)
- US Annual Working Hours per Worker vs Worldwide Major Earthquakes (M5+) (r = -0.89)
- US Annual Working Hours per Worker vs US Life Expectancy (r = -0.87)
- US Female Labor Force Participation vs US Health Expenditure (r = -0.87)
- US Fertility Rate vs US Annual Working Hours per Worker (r = +0.87)
Correlation does not imply causation. How the verdict is worked out.