CorrelateAI › Pairs
US Female Labor Force Participation vs US Military Expenditure
US Female Labor Force Participation and US Military Expenditure correlate at r = -0.17 over 35 years (1990–2024), p = 0.342. With the time trend removed, r = -0.40. Not statistically significant.
Verdict: Not statistically significant. With n = 35, this correlation isn't statistically significant (p = 0.342). It could easily be chance.
- Pearson r
- -0.17
- p-value
- 0.342
- Years compared (n)
- 35 (1990–2024)
- 95% confidence interval
- -0.47 to 0.18
- Correlation with the time trend removed
- -0.40
Sources
- US Female Labor Force Participation (% of women 15+): World Bank. US Female Labor Force Participation (World Bank indicator SL.TLF.CACT.FE.ZS).
- US Military Expenditure (% of GDP): World Bank. US Military Expenditure (World Bank indicator MS.MIL.XPND.GD.ZS).
Related pairs
- US Infant Mortality vs US Military Expenditure (r = +0.91)
- US Life Expectancy vs US Military Expenditure (r = -0.88)
- US Annual CO₂ Emissions vs US Military Expenditure (r = -0.88)
- US Female Labor Force Participation vs US Health Expenditure (r = -0.87)
- US Birth Rate vs US Military Expenditure (r = +0.87)
- US Meat Consumption per Person vs US Military Expenditure (r = -0.87)
Correlation does not imply causation. How the verdict is worked out.