CorrelateAI › Pairs
Sunspot Number vs US Female Labor Force Participation
Sunspot Number and US Female Labor Force Participation correlate at r = -0.06 over 36 years (1990–2025), p = 0.720. With the time trend removed, r = -0.20. Not statistically significant.
Verdict: Not statistically significant. With n = 36, this correlation isn't statistically significant (p = 0.720). It could easily be chance.
- Pearson r
- -0.06
- p-value
- 0.720
- Years compared (n)
- 36 (1990–2025)
- 95% confidence interval
- -0.38 to 0.27
- Correlation with the time trend removed
- -0.20
Sources
- Sunspot Number (yearly mean): SILSO. Yearly mean total sunspot number (SILSO, Royal Observatory of Belgium).
- US Female Labor Force Participation (% of women 15+): World Bank. US Female Labor Force Participation (World Bank indicator SL.TLF.CACT.FE.ZS).
Related pairs
- US Female Labor Force Participation vs US Health Expenditure (r = -0.87)
- US Annual CO₂ Emissions vs US Female Labor Force Participation (r = +0.85)
- US Alcohol Consumption vs US Female Labor Force Participation (r = -0.82)
- US Energy Use per Capita vs US Female Labor Force Participation (r = +0.76)
- US Coal Consumption vs US Female Labor Force Participation (r = +0.74)
- US Female Labor Force Participation vs US R&D Expenditure (r = -0.73)
Correlation does not imply causation. How the verdict is worked out.